You bought a commercial building and leased it to a tenant. Now an agent is quoting you “commercial property,” a friend says you need “landlord insurance,” and the lender wants something called lessor’s risk. These are not three competing products you have to choose between. They are overlapping terms for related coverage, and which one fits depends on what you own and who occupies it.
Here is how the three line up for an Arizona owner who leases space.
What is the difference between lessor’s risk, commercial property, and landlord insurance?
Commercial property insurance is a single coverage. It pays to repair or replace your building and the business personal property you own inside it after a covered event such as fire, wind, theft, vandalism, or a burst pipe. It does not include liability, and it does not replace lost rent.
Lessor’s risk only (LRO) is a package designed for owners who lease commercial space. It contains that property coverage, then adds two things a landlord needs: landlord liability for injury claims by tenants or visitors, and loss of rents to replace rental income while the building is being repaired after a covered loss. So LRO is commercial property plus landlord liability plus rent coverage, written for a building you do not occupy yourself. Our overview of lessor’s risk only insurance walks through each piece in detail.
Landlord insurance is the term most people use for the residential version of that same idea, covering owners who rent out houses, condos, or apartments. It is not the standard label for a commercial building.
So if you lease space to a business, you generally want lessor’s risk only coverage, which already does the work of both commercial property and landlord liability.
Comparison table: LRO vs commercial property vs landlord insurance
| Commercial property | Lessor’s risk only (LRO) | Landlord insurance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who buys it | Any owner of commercial property | Owner who leases commercial space to tenants | Owner who rents out residential property |
| Building / structure | Covered | Covered | Covered |
| Property you own inside | Covered | Covered | Covered (landlord-owned items) |
| Landlord liability | Not included | Included | Included |
| Loss of rents | Often optional or excluded | Included | Included |
| Tenant’s own property | Not covered | Not covered | Not covered |
| Typical property type | Commercial | Commercial | Residential |
A standalone commercial property policy can be the right fit when you occupy the building yourself, or when liability and rent loss are handled elsewhere. For a leased commercial building, LRO usually closes the gaps that bare property coverage leaves open.
Does general liability cover damage to my own building?
No. General liability covers bodily injury and property damage your business causes to other people, such as a customer or a passerby. It does not pay to repair your own building if a fire or storm hits it. According to Insureon, a general liability policy generally excludes damage to property the business owns, leases, or rents, including the structure, fixtures, and equipment.
That distinction trips up a lot of new owners. To protect the building itself you need property coverage, which is what is built into LRO. A landlord who buys only general liability has covered tenant injury claims but left the building and the rent exposed.
General liability vs lessor’s risk for a commercial landlord
Lessor’s risk solves the landlord’s real problem, and standalone general liability does not. Your largest exposures as a landlord are the building, the rental income, and injuries on the parts of the premises you control, like shared hallways, stairwells, and parking lots.
LRO carries the premises liability for those tenant and visitor claims and also covers the structure and lost rent. A general liability policy on its own carries the liability but leaves your building and rent unprotected. That is why a commercial landlord usually wants LRO rather than general liability by itself, though many leases still require the tenant to carry their own general liability and name you as additional insured.
Is lessor’s risk the same as a business owner’s policy (BOP)?
No, but they are close cousins. A business owner’s policy (BOP) bundles commercial property, general liability, and business interruption for a company that operates out of a space. LRO is built for the owner who leases that space to someone else.
The practical differences: LRO includes loss of rents in place of business interruption, and its liability is tuned to a leased building rather than an operating business. BOPs also carry eligibility limits, and many carriers will not write a BOP on a vacant, older, or habitational building. Those are common reasons a property becomes hard to place and moves to the excess and surplus market.
What about cost in Arizona?
Premium depends on the building’s age, construction, location, occupancy, and the limits you choose, so there is no single statewide number. Replacement-cost value, which drives the property portion, varies widely too. For a realistic breakdown with named-source ranges, see our guide to lessor’s risk insurance cost in Arizona rather than relying on a one-line estimate.
Where BrokerPro fits
BrokerPro places lessor’s risk only coverage for Arizona building owners statewide, including the vacant, older, habitational, and previously declined buildings that standard BOPs often turn away. We write through both standard and excess and surplus markets and issue lender-ready evidence so your loan can close. Submit your property for a quote or call or text 602-301-5171, and we will match the right structure to how your building is actually occupied.